Understanding the Differences Between DOL and IRS Requirements for Qualified Retirement Plans
By: Bryan Uecker
Navigating the regulatory landscape of qualified retirement plans can be complex for plan sponsors and administrators. The Department of Labor (DOL) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) play pivotal roles in overseeing these plans, but they have distinct requirements and regulations. Understanding the differences between the two can help plan sponsors ensure compliance and effectively manage their retirement plans.
DOL Requirements:
The DOL primarily focuses on enforcing the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), which sets standards for the operation and administration of retirement plans. Some key DOL requirements for qualified plans include:
1. Reporting and Disclosure: The DOL mandates that plan sponsors provide participants with various disclosures, such as the Summary Plan Description (SPD) and Summary of Material Modifications (SMM). These documents inform participants about their rights, benefits, and obligations under the plan.
2. Fiduciary Responsibilities: Plan fiduciaries have a duty to act prudently and solely in the interest of plan participants and beneficiaries. The DOL oversees fiduciary conduct, ensuring that fiduciaries fulfill their obligations and avoid conflicts of interest.
3. Vesting and Participation: The DOL sets rules regarding vesting schedules and eligibility criteria for plan participation. These regulations aim to protect participants’ rights to their accrued benefits and ensure equitable access to retirement savings opportunities.
IRS Requirements:
While the DOL focuses on ERISA compliance, the IRS administers the tax laws related to qualified retirement plans. Key IRS requirements for these plans include:
1. Plan Qualification: To receive favorable tax treatment, retirement plans must meet specific qualification requirements outlined in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). These requirements cover various aspects of plan design, such as contribution limits, distribution rules, and nondiscrimination testing.
2. Plan Documentation: The IRS requires plan sponsors to maintain up-to-date plan documents that reflect the terms and conditions of the retirement plan. These documents must comply with IRS regulations and be available for review by plan participants and government agencies.
3. Tax Reporting: Plan sponsors are responsible for filing annual tax returns and informational forms with the IRS, reporting contributions, distributions, and other plan-related activities. Compliance with IRS reporting requirements ensures that the plan maintains its tax-qualified status.
Comparison:
While both the DOL and IRS regulate qualified retirement plans, they have distinct areas of focus and enforcement authority. The DOL emphasizes participant protection, fiduciary oversight, and transparency through disclosure requirements. In contrast, the IRS focuses on tax qualification, plan documentation, and compliance with tax laws to maintain the plan’s favorable tax status.
Conclusion:
Understanding the differences between DOL and IRS requirements is essential for plan sponsors and administrators tasked with managing qualified retirement plans. By adhering to both sets of regulations, sponsors can ensure compliance, protect participants’ interests, and maintain the tax-qualified status of their plans. Staying informed about evolving regulations from both agencies is key to successfully navigating the complex landscape of retirement plan administration.
- Published in ROBS 401(k), ROBS 401k Provider, Small Business, Starting a Business
Selling Your BORSA Business
By: Bryan Uecker
When a seller has a BORSA™ (Business Owners Retirement Savings Account), also known as ROBS, and is considering selling their business, the decision between an asset sale and a stock sale involves additional considerations due to the BORSA/ROBS structure. Here’s a comparison of the two approaches in this context:
Asset Sale
1. Definition: In an asset sale, the buyer acquires specific assets and liabilities of the business rather than the entity itself. This includes tangible assets (like equipment and inventory) and intangible assets (like trademarks and customer lists).
2. Tax Implications: For the Seller: The business entity may face double taxation. First, the entity is taxed on the gain from the sale of assets at the corporate tax rate. Then, any remaining sale proceeds are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership percentage and taxed accordingly. For the Buyer: The buyer benefits from a step-up in the basis of the acquired assets, which allows for depreciation or amortization based on the purchase price, potentially reducing future tax liabilities.
3. Complexity: Asset sales require detailed purchase price allocation among various assets and involve complex tax considerations.
4. Liability: The buyer assumes only the liabilities specifically agreed upon in the sale. This reduces the risk of inheriting unknown or contingent liabilities.
5. BORSA/ROBS Considerations: The C-Corp will have to estimate its federal and state tax bill, pay the estimated taxes, pay its final expenses, dissolve, and lastly, any remaining cash gets distributed to the stockholders according to ownership percentage. So, if the 401(k) owns 95% of the company, 95% will go to the 401 (k). The double taxation kicks in when the seller eventually takes retirement distributions taxed as ordinary income. The 5% going to the individual is taxed using capital gains rates.
Stock Sale
1. Definition: In a stock sale, the buyer acquires the company’s shares, gaining ownership of the entire entity, including all its assets and liabilities.
2. Tax Implications: Selling stock can be advantageous for the seller. 95% goes to the 401(k) plan with no tax due until the seller takes retirement distributions. The personal stock portion will be taxed using capital gains treatment, potentially resulting in a lower tax rate on the proceeds. For the Buyer, the buyer assumes the company’s existing tax basis in its assets and takes on all of the business’s liabilities, which may include unknown or contingent liabilities.
3. Complexity: Stock sales tend to be less complex from a transactional standpoint than asset sales, as the focus is on transferring ownership rather than valuing and transferring individual assets.
4. Liability: The buyer inherits all the company’s liabilities, known or unknown, which can be a significant risk factor.
5. BORSA/ROBS Considerations: If the seller’s BORSA plan holds stock in the company, the plan will sell its shares for cash as part of the stock sale. The account can then be rolled into an IRA or other retirement plan vehicle and won’t be taxed until withdrawn. The portion owned outside the plan will be taxed using capital gains rates.
Conclusion
The BORSA™/ROBS structure affects both asset and stock sales of a business. The choice between the two will depend on various factors, including tax considerations, liability issues, licensing issues, and the specific goals of both the seller and the buyer. DRDA is uniquely positioned to help you navigate these complex transactions and ensure compliance with tax, Department of Labor, banking and regulatory requirements so you keep more of what you have earned from growing your business.
- Published in Job Posting
